Sony A7r II Vs Sony...
Clear all
Sony A7r II Vs Sony A7 III: Which Is Better?
Sony A7r II Vs Sony A7 III: Which Is Better?
Group: Registered
Joined: 2021-12-23
New Member

About Me



Weddings are the most often suggested use for low-light photography, and the A7iii features a 1EV additional stop to enable PDAF. Even while it is still more costly than the A7 III, which is likely to sell for $2000 / £2000 / €2300 when it is introduced, it is substantially less expensive than the A7r III, which was released last year. The inclusion of an AF-ON button, additional customisation choices, and the new menu system found on the flagship cameras, the A9 and A7r III, are among the other enhancements to the camera. Consequently, if you want world-class action skills, the a7 III will be a much superior choice. A second card slot is only an additional benefit for some photographers, and if this is the case for you, the a7R II will still perform well in your hands.





On the A7 III, you'll also discover autofocus in magnification mode, which is ideal for macro photography, as well as an AF Track Sens option, which allows you to customize the responsiveness of the autofocus while shooting in continuous mode. The A7r II, which was introduced almost three years earlier, is the second generation of A7 cameras, after the A7 and A7r. Because it has lost its position as the flagship to its replacement, the A7r II, it is now substantially more cheap than it was before.





Despite this, it maintains a number of appealing characteristics, not the least of which is one of the greatest full-frame sensors available on the market. Both performances are rather outstanding, and the dynamic range of 13.9 stops is far more than the industry norm. However, for photographers who need to capture as much highlight and shadow information as possible, the a7 III will be the superior choice.



The Sony A7R Mark IV is the best of the bunch, thanks to its EVF, which has 5.76 million dots of resolution, which is the joint greatest quality available on any contemporary EVF. All three viewfinders, on the other hand, provide the same 100 percent coverage and 0.78x magnification across the board. Print After a normalization phase, which turns all photos, regardless of their original resolution, to an 8Mpix image, this page provides the print performance measurement numbers and graph produced from a RAW image. A standard 300dpi 8"x12" format has been used for printing, which corresponds to about the physical size of an 8Mpix picture printed at 100 percent magnification.



In compared to the full frame mode, where the camera is forced to conduct line skipping owing to the increased resolution, the results are far superior in terms of sharpness and low light performance in this mode. With a maximum shutter speed of 1/8000s, both cameras are capable of shooting in mechanical, electronic first curtain, and electronic shutter modes. The A7 III has an extra anti-flicker setting, which should help to decrease the strobing and banding effects caused by some artificial lighting. The A7 III's sensor has been freshly built, and Sony claims it will have 15 stops of dynamic range, which would put it above of the 42MP chip, which has a DXO Mark rating of 13.9Ev.



The XAVC S codec allows the A7 III and A7r II to record in 4K at up to 30 frames per second at 100Mbps on both models. On either camera, you may switch between full-frame and Super35/APS-C modes, but the results are somewhat different, as we'll see below. At least in comparison to the A7r II, the function buttons, playback mode, and menu system are all still available when files are being written to the SD card on this model. A new shutter mechanism is also included in the A7 III, which claims to lessen vibrations when compared to the devices from the previous generation. The Sony a7R II and the Sony a7 III are both excellent cameras that may provide a great deal of value for money for the dedicated hobbyist or professional photographer.



The a7R II only has a single SD card slot, but the a7 III has two slots — one of which accepts UHS-II cards – and one of which does not. Construction-wise, both cameras are constructed of magnesium alloy components and have good weather sealing capabilities. Either body will be great for professionals who take good care of their equipment, but I wouldn't recommend putting either of these cameras through significant testing (in other words, grab a waterproof rain cover, etc.). It's possible to pick AF points using either this button or the touch screen, and they're both significantly more convenient than the a7R II's wheel-based system. However, although the a7R II and the a7 III are almost equal in terms of size and weight, there are some small design variations between the two cameras that you should be aware of.





For certain users, this app alone may be worth the price of the whole collection - read on to find out more about this in our evaluation. Even with fast UHS-II cards, buffer cleaning may be a lengthy process. UHS-II support is limited to a single card slot; There is no lossless compressed RAW option available. There is no dedicated battery charger supplied. Menus are still difficult to understand. There is no built-in flash. Cameras with longer battery life are able to capture more images before their batteries run out of power. As a result, the A7 III will very certainly be the camera of choice for the majority of photographers.





What makes the difference between the two cameras is that Sony incorporated touchscreen functionality and a slightly greater 1.44m dot resolution with the switch from the A7R II to the A7R III. The Sony A7R IV retains the same screen as the A7R III, thus apart from the inclusion of touch functionality in the A7R III, there hasn't been much change. Sony's A7 III is a relatively new model that is now available in the company's product line-up. The A7R II, on the other hand, has been phased out of production (but can be found pre-owned on eBay). It is possible that the ability of a camera to interact with its surroundings will be an essential consideration in the camera selection process for some imaging applications.



Touch control may be especially useful in a variety of situations, such as when adjusting the focus point. Several contemporary cameras are not only capable of shooting still photographs, but they are also capable of recording short films. For moving pictures, both of the cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a suitably fast readout speed, and both provide the same movie requirements (4K/30p). The A7r II produces the greatest results when used in Super35 mode, which allows it to execute complete pixel readout on a smaller area of the image sensor.



position as the
Social Networks
Member Activity
Forum Posts
Question Comments
Received Likes
Blog Posts
Blog Comments